Mishcon de Reya page structure
Site header
Menu
Main content section
Family office - old boardroom

Family Offices: The Development of Family Office Structures in the UK, Singapore and Hong Kong

Posted on 11 June 2025

Introduction 

The concept of family offices has gained significant attention amid the great wealth transfer. While family offices have existed in some form or another for centuries, they are now a key topic in private wealth and investment management circles and we are seeing significant growth trends across different jurisdictions.  

The increased interest in family offices also highlights potential risks. Recent controversies have spotlighted the potential for misuse of family offices, with minimal regulation in most jurisdictions regarding who can establish one. As their profile rises, so does the risk of abuse. Protecting against these dangers is crucial. 

This article explores regulatory frameworks in the UK, Singapore, and Hong Kong - popular jurisdictions for family offices - and how the regulations in those jurisdictions are likely to impact the growth of family offices. 

Growth trends and challenges 

Family offices have grown significantly over the past decade. Deloitte predicts family wealth will rise from US$1.1 trillion in 2019 to US$2.8 trillion by 2030, with over 8,000 single family offices (SFOs) worldwide expected to increase by 75% by 2030. In 2024, family offices managed $3.1 trillion of assets compared to $4.5 trillion by global hedge funds. While North America and Europe host most family offices, Asia and the Middle East are popular emerging locations.  

A study by Ocorian found that 86% of family offices consider governance as their biggest challenge, with fewer than 20% feeling well-prepared for complex global regulations. The same study found that 34% of family office professionals consider navigating regulatory compliance issues to be one of the biggest challenges they face.  

High-profile cases, such as the $36 billion Archegos Capital collapse in 2021 and a recent money laundering scandal in Singapore, have highlighted risks in the family office sector arising out of the current lack of regulation (when compared against other global wealth management organisations). In response, Singapore is implementing higher scrutiny of ultimate beneficial owners and their sources of wealth, and is looking into tightening its regulations as the article sets out further below. Global governments face the challenge of continuing to attract family offices, while preventing increasing abuse due to insufficient regulation. 

UK
  • The UK has historically been favoured as a jurisdiction for family offices due to its geographical location (with easy access to the US, Europe and the UAE), proliferation of highly experienced investment management, legal and finance professionals, and its highly regarded legal framework and regulatory infrastructure. That being said, family offices are seen as the least formally regulated area of wealth management in the UK. There are no specific regulations for family offices, and they are subject to regulations in the same way as other investment management businesses. 
  • A family office will be regulated under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) and associated regulations if it carries on regulated activities by way of business in the UK.  In such circumstances, the family office will need to be authorised and supervised by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).  Examples of the regulated activities that family offices often carry on include:  managing investment assets belonging to another person where the management involves exercise of discretion, providing advice to investors on the merits of investment, arranging for investments to take place, and dealing as principal when carried out in relation to investments such as shares, bonds, units in funds and derivatives. 
  • Whether the family office is in scope of the regulations is subject to how its operations are structured and work in practice.  A family office will not be in scope of FSMA if it is not considered to be carrying on such activities "by way of business in the UK".  Where the activities are carried on by way of business, there may also be exclusions available for certain activities, such as when the family office conducts activities on behalf of another entity within the same group.  A family office is therefore only likely to be caught if it is carrying on activities by way of business in the UK, and an exclusion is not available, e.g., managing assets which are not exclusively family assets, or assets being held by distinct legal entities etc. 
  • Often exclusions are available to SFOs. In most cases, family offices are treated as lightly regulated private wealth-management companies and, whilst they are arguably the fastest-growing area of wealth management, they are also the least understood and least formally regulated in the UK. 
Singapore
  • Singapore's family office regime is well-known, attracting high-profile individuals like James Dyson and Sergey Brin. The city-state offers a favourable tax exemption regime and has specific legislation and regulatory requirements for family offices. 
  • Similar to the UK, family offices may need regulation if they perform "Regulated Activities" such as fund management under the Securities and Futures Act (SFA). However, unlike the UK, a more stringent requirement has recently been introduced: a capital markets services licence from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) is also required unless an exemption applies. 
  • SFOs are typically exempt from licensing under the SFA if: 
  1. The assets are held in "related corporation(s)" fund vehicles; or 
  2. A "case-by-case exemption" from MAS on the basis that the SFO is managing assets for one family and is wholly owned or controlled by family members. 
  • The MAS proposes a new framework with a structure-agnostic class exemption for SFOs, exempting them from licensing if the family office is: 
  1. Incorporated in Singapore; 
  2. Wholly owned by family members; 
  3. Managing funds for family and non-family key employees, with non-family AUM not exceeding 10%; and 
  4. Maintaining an account with at least one MAS-regulated bank. 
  • This framework provides an additional level of protection to the UK regime, by ensuring that any family office has to either (i) apply for a capital markets services licence or, (ii) if exempt, hold a bank account with at least one MAS-regulated bank. Both requirements mean that any family office is going to be subject to AML requirements either directly or through a regulated bank. 
Hong Kong

While family offices have long existed in Hong Kong for large wealthy Chinese families based in the city, it was the introduction of a specific SFO tax concession in May 2023 that saw the proliferation of family office structures in Hong Kong in recent years. Given its geographical location, sophisticated capital market, and the unique one-country two-system constitutional principle, it remains a popular jurisdiction for setting up family offices, particularly for Chinese families across Asia.  

Similar to the UK, Hong Kong does not have a specific regulatory regime for family offices but operates an activity-based licensing system, where persons carrying out "Regulated Activities" are required to obtain a licence under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571).  

Multi-family offices typically would carry on a business comprising certain regulated activities such as dealing in securities and asset management, in which case a licence under Cap. 571 would normally be required.  

SFOs are generally not required to apply for a licence as they are established to serve the investment needs of members of a single family, rather than operating as a business. In any event, if a SFO is caught by the general licensing requirement, often it would fall within the group exemption where services are provided solely by one group company to another, i.e., by the family office to the family investment holding vehicle. 

 

How do the regimes compare? 

The UK and Hong Kong have similar regimes in that there are no tailor made regulations for family offices and although exemptions have not been put in place deliberately to apply to SFOs, they often will.  

On the other hand, Singapore's more stringent requirement under the MAS means that all family offices must have a corporate form and a business relationship with a MAS-regulated bank and be subject to strict AML requirements. Further, the regulations in Singapore state that the SFO must be related to the entity holding the family's assets, either as a subsidiary or by having the same holding company.   

Each jurisdiction is regularly consulting on changes to their current regime. They each want to compete as a jurisdiction of choice for this rapidly growing area of business, whilst also ensuring there is adequate protection to avoid scandals and abuse of the system and to provide reassurance. Singapore's current regulations do this well – the existing framework and additional proposals should deter unsuitable candidates from setting up a family office whilst still encouraging legitimate family offices to the jurisdiction. 

One challenge to future governments on considering the tightening of regimes is striking the balance between appropriate regulatory safeguards for investment activities and the freedom for family offices to provide non-financial services to the family without regulatory ramifications.  

Despite the regulatory challenges faced in some jurisdictions, family offices continue their unprecedented growth, driven by their ability to adapt and innovate, ensuring they remain a vital force in global wealth management and a promising avenue for future investment opportunities and wealth management. 

The application of the regulations and any available exclusions is highly complex in all three jurisdictions.  Specific legal advice should be sought to find out how the relevant regulations may apply to your family office. 

How can we help you?
Help

How can we help you?

Subscribe: I'd like to keep in touch

If your enquiry is urgent please call +44 20 3321 7000

Crisis Hotline

I'm a client

I'm looking for advice

Something else