Mishcon de Reya page structure
Site header
Menu
Main content section

Mishcon & The World

Issue 25: September 2025

Mishcon & The World

Editor's note

Adam Rose - Mishcon de Reya

AI is one of the first things I find being discussed when I meet lawyers from around the world. 

We discuss the question of how accurate our respective AI systems are. How will younger lawyers ever get to learn what good drafting looks like.  How will we work out what to charge our clients when we have spent at least 35 years charging on the basis of the hourly rate. 

What we forget is that until we started charging by time, lawyers would charge by the letter, by the phone call, by the attendance note, and meeting. When hourly rates became the absolute way to charge, no doubt the law firm managers of those days threw their hands up in horror – will life, they must have thought, ever be the same again? 

I remember too when I got my first computer on my desk at work. I was the second solicitor in my then firm to get one. Again, everyone used to say, it is the end of life as we know it: books were written about the end of lawyers.  Computers would take over.  In fact, law firms have grown hugely since those days, with even more lawyers, producing even more documents, even more quickly.   

So, here we are again, at another dramatic cross-roads for law firms, where, indeed, life won’t be the same.  But I suspect it will be ok for those of us who adopt to the new ways, and new types of work will be developed, and more lawyering will be done more quickly than ever before. And in some time in the future, someone like me will look back nostalgically at those days in 2025 when we didn’t know how AI will play out. 

Sometimes, you gotta roll with it. 

News
Mishcon de Reya client lounge

Mishcon de Reya acts for Diag Human SE and Josef Stava in successful defence of investment treaty award against the Czech Republic

In a ruling handed down this week following a consequentials hearing on 15 July 2025, the Court of Appeal confirmed the award in favour of Mr Stava and that all jurisdictional challenges against him had been dismissed. In doing so, the Court comprehensively dismissed the Czech Republic's attempt to argue that its earlier decision to set aside the award in favour of Diag Human SE on jurisdictional grounds impacted Mr Stava's own entitlement to damages.

News
Black and blue striped texture

Fujifilm v Kodak: UPC grants first injunction covering the UK

In February 2025, the European Court of Justice (CJEU) ruled in Electrolux v BSH that EU member state courts have jurisdiction over infringement claims concerning patents in other countries, where the defendant is domiciled in that member state, even if validity is challenged.

Subscribe

Never miss a publication by signing up to our mailing list

Mishcon & The World Issues

How can we help you?
Help

How can we help you?

Subscribe: I'd like to keep in touch

If your enquiry is urgent please call +44 20 3321 7000

Crisis Hotline

I'm a client

I'm looking for advice

Something else