Cryptocurrency case tracker

The Court found that it was appropriate to continue a non-disclosure order that the claimant obtained against unknown hackers.  The unknown hackers stole vast amounts of data and tried to blackmail the claimant for £300,000 in order not to publish it.  The Court was satisfied that the position had not changed since the interim non-disclosure order was granted and there was no evidence that the unknown hackers had complied with the original interim order.

The USA had appealed an earlier decision to grant bail to the respondent, who was accused of computer fraud, bank fraud and money-laundering.  The Court found that he had substantial assets at his disposal, including control of over $2 million of bitcoin.  The Court found there was a substantial risk that he would not surrender to bail.

Corbiere Ltd, who carry out quantitative investment research and software development were granted an order for disclosure in relation to confidential information misappropriated by the defendant. As part of long running proceedings, Mr Xu had failed to disclose certain items, including his blackberry and crypto-card, used by him to hack into Corbiere's systems.

Lunar Missions unsuccessfully appealed against a decision by HMRC that the company ought to have been registered for VAT from 16 December 2014, in the context of funds raised through the crowdfunding site, "Kickstarter" and the extent to which these funds were "prepayments".

Surrey police successfully applied for permission to convert 295 bitcoins, which were the subject of restraint proceedings, into sterling. This because of the volatility of bitcoins and the fact that they could be hacked, even when held by the police in a new wallet. 

Navee appealed against a decision by HMRC to deny the company the right to deduct input tax of around £100,000 claimed in VAT. The tribunal agreed with HMRC that the input tax was incurred by Navee in a transaction connected with the fraudulent evasion of VAT and that Navee either knew or should have known of that fact. The transaction with which the matter was concerned was paid for in Bitcoin and HMRC noted that there was no audit trail to prove payment has been received.

Mr Harding successfully appealed against a district judge's order granting summary judgment to Bartercard in relation to a case which related to whether a debt owed by a member of a virtual currency trading system to the company running the system had not become payable in pounds sterling rather than the virtual currency.

The application by the defendants was refused as Judge held that the way in which they had lost or supressed data significantly prejudiced Michael's ability to prepare for a case turning on forensic analysis of said data. Part of the reason the defendants argued they could disclose material was because they suffered a cyber-attack in which the ransomware demanded payment of 1.2 Bitcoins.

In a reference from the Supreme Court in Sweden, the ECJ decided that services provided in respect of bitcoin trading was exempt from VAT.  The finding that the exchange of bitcoin for currency fell within the 'currency' exemption and therefore it should not attract VAT.