Mishcon de Reya page structure
Site header
Menu
Main content section
Abstract crypto data

UK Crypto rules taking shape

Posted on 30 January 2026

Reading time 11 minutes

On 16 December 2025, the FCA published its proposals for UK cryptoasset rules. The proposals are set out in the following consultation papers:

  1. CP25/40: Regulating cryptoasset activities;
  2. CP25/41: Regulating cryptoassets: admissions and disclosures and market abuse regime for cryptoassets; and
  3. CP25/42: A prudential regime for cryptoasset firms.

The FCA is looking for feedback on its proposals under the consultation papers, which close for comment on 12 February 2026.

We have summarised the key proposals relating to CP25/41 on the admissions and disclosures and market abuse regime below, as well as a few relevant points from CP25/42 on the prudential regime. 

In addition to this, on 8 January 2026, the FCA published several webpages on the cryptoasset regulatory regime, which is due to come into force on 25 October 2027, including a page relating to the FCA's supervision and enforcement. You will find the FCA webpages here:

CP25/41: Regulating cryptoassets: admissions and disclosures and market abuse regime for cryptoassets 

Proposal topic  Proposal details 
Admissions and disclosure Regime (A&D
Admission gateway  Cryptoasset Trading Platforms (CATP) must set and publish risk-based, objective criteria for admitting cryptoassets, regularly review these criteria, and reject qualifying cryptoassets the CATP believes is likely to be detrimental to retail investors. 
Due diligence  CATPs must verify key information before admitting qualifying cryptoassets to trade. The FCA provides a non-exhaustive list of examples that CATPs should consider, including identity, tokenomics, code, partnerships and risk disclosures. The CATP should document any unverified items, which must be disclosed in the qualifying cryptoasset disclosure document (QCDD). 
Disclosure documents 

A QCDD is required before admission, subject to exceptions for UK-issued qualifying stablecoins, qualifying cryptoassets fungible with qualifying cryptoassets already admitted to trading on the CATP (with a QCDD already published), and where the qualifying cryptoasset will only be made available for qualified investors to trade. 

A Supplementary Disclosure Document (SDD) is needed for significant changes pre-admission. Where an SDD is subsequently published, purchasers will have the right to withdraw their acceptances. 

Content and format 

The FCA has proposed high-level general requirements and guidance on the format of the QCDD. The QCDD must be in English, and suitable for retail investors. The FCA suggests the QCDD should highlight: who is liable to pay compensation for misleading statements or omissions in the QCDD; that SDDs may be published; and any potential conflicts of interest involving the CATP operator. There will also be additional disclosure requirements where the qualifying cryptoasset seeks or purports to maintain a stable value.   

Further to DP24/4, the QCDD must also include a summary of key information which the FCA is consulting on.   

Publication and repository  CATPs must publish QCDDs/SDDs on their websites and file them with the FCA's central repository before trading. 
Liability for the QCDD or SDD 

Persons responsible for a QCDD or SDD will be subject to the statutory liability and compensation provisions in the Cryptoasset Regulation, and the FCA rules (under CRYPTO 3.6) will specify who is responsible in different scenarios. 

Persons that are responsible may be liable for the content of the document and liable to pay compensation, where an untrue or misleading statement, or an omission from the QCDD or SDD has resulted in a customer suffering a loss in respect of the qualifying cryptoasset.   

The FCA proposes that the QCDD (or SDD) clearly states who is responsible for the document. Generally, the proposed rules provide that the person seeking admission of the qualifying cryptoasset will be responsible (both where they prepare the document or use a third party to produce the document) along with any other person who accepts responsibility and is stated in the QCDD/SDD.   

Where there is no clear issuer and the CATP admits the qualifying cryptoasset on its own behalf and prepares a QCDD, that CATP will be responsible and the QCDD will confirm this.   

A PFLS will need to meet the relevant content and format requirements that will be set out in CRYPTO 3.7.  

The Protected Forward-Looking Statements (PFLS

The FCA proposes that the use of PFLS will be voluntary, allowing persons issuing a QCDD or SDD to include certain forward-looking statements. The different liability regime reduces the risk of successful consumer compensation claims.  

The proposed regime will broadly follow the Public Offers and Admission to Trading Regulations 2024 (POATR) but will be adapted to the cryptoasset context.   

Where information is already required to be disclosed under Regulation 13(1) Cryptoasset Regulations, QCDD content rules or under a CATPs rules, this would not qualify as a PFLS.   

Financial Promotions  The Cryptoasset Regulations will amend article 70 of the Financial Promotion Order to provide an exemption for QCDDs and SDDs.
Intermediaries  It is proposed that UK consumers will only be able to buy or subscribe for qualifying cryptoassets via regulated intermediaries, where the cryptoassets are (i) sold as part of an offer that is conditional on admission to trading; (ii) already admitted to trading; or (iii) UK-issued qualifying stablecoins.   
Stablecoins 

UK-issued qualifying stablecoins will be subject to a separate A&D regime so that authorised firms do not need to comply with two overlapping disclosure requirements.   

UK-issued qualifying stablecoins will need to produce the following forms of disclosure:  

  • in the form of information on the issuer's website which is publicly available; and  
  • a UK-issued qualifying stablecoin QCDD available on the issuer's website and on an FCA-owned centralised repository.  

Voluntary PFLS rules will not apply to issues of qualifying stablecoins.

Consumer Duty 

The general Consumer Duty is disapplied for admissions activities relating to trading and public offers of qualifying cryptoassets. Instead, bespoke A&D rules will apply. These rules will apply regardless of whether the person engaged in the activities are approved persons.   

The A&D rules will include specific provisions on consumer understanding to ensure firms help consumers make informed decisions. Additionally, CATPs will be required to implement rules that require QCDDs to be presented in a way that supports consumer understanding.   

Transitional arrangements The FCA is considering transitional arrangements and will provide clarity in a future consultation.  
Market Abuse Regime for Cryptoassets (MARC
Scope  Prohibits insider dealing, unlawful disclosure, and market manipulation for qualifying cryptoassets on CATPs, adapting UK MAR principles for crypto-specific features. 
Inside information 

Issuers, offerors, and CATPs must publicly disclose inside information promptly unless a justified delay is recorded.  

Delayed disclosure may be made where immediate disclosure of inside information is likely to prejudice their legitimate interests, the delay is not likely to mislead the public and the confidentiality of the inside information can be ensured.  

Dissemination of inside information  Initial disclosure should be made on the issuer, offeror, or CATP website and actively disseminated through other channels. The inside information should subsequently, and as soon as possible, be uploaded to the FCA repository. 
Legitimate market practices (LMPs

The FCA proposes to provide rules and guidance on the application of LMPs and proposes that coin burning and crypto-stabilisation could be considered LMPs.   

Firms will not be considered to have engaged in market manipulation where their conduct is undertaken for legitimate reasons.   

Systems and controls  CATPs and intermediaries must maintain proportionate controls to prevent, detect, and disrupt market abuse, including personal account dealing rules, information barriers, staff training, and record-keeping. The consultation also proposes specific CATP (or large CATP) only systems and controls.   
Outsourcing  CATPs and intermediaries can outsource monitoring functions to third parties or group entities. Where firms outsource this function, they will be subject to SYSC 8.   
On-chain monitoring 

Large CATPs (≥ £10 million annual revenue) must conduct on-chain monitoring.  

Smaller CATPs and intermediaries must maintain proportionate off-chain monitoring capabilities but are not required to undertake on-chain monitoring. However, smaller CATPs are encouraged under the rules to undertake on-chain monitoring. 

Insider lists 

Issuers, offerors, and CATPs must maintain accurate insider lists. Proposed templates for insider lists are found in CRYPTO 4.12 and the templates include:  

  • identity of individuals with access to inside information; 
  • reasons for inclusion on the list;  
  • date and time the individual obtained or ceased to have access to the information; and  
  • crypto wallet addresses (if applicable).  
 

Regulation 32 of the Cryptoasset Regulations creates an obligation to share information to counter market abuse and enables the FCA to make rules as to how this obligation applies.  

The FCA proposes to introduce rules for large CATPs to disclose information to other large CATPs where:  

  • they have reasonable grounds to suspect that cryptoasset market abuse has occurred, is occurring, or is likely to occur; and  
  • it is necessary to disclose information to detect, prevent or disrupt the market abuse. 

The FCA intends to publish guidance and examples under CRYPTO 4.9 and will also set out rules under CRYPTO 4.9 on a safe harbour where certain conditions are met.   

The rules will be limited, and will not cover liability for data protection breaches, and only apply to the disclosure and receipt of information, not the subsequent use of such information.   

Firms must keep a record for five years of information that was shared or has not been shared following analysis. 

CP25/42: A prudential regime for cryptoasset firms 
Proposal topic  Proposal details 
Regulatory coverage  The proposals apply to a wide range of cryptoasset activities, including trading platforms, staking, arranging deals, and dealing as agent or principal. 
Sourcebooks 

There are two proposed sourcebooks:  

  • COREPRU: cross-sectoral rules for cryptoassets firms; and  
  • CRYPTOPRU: sector-specific rules tailored to crypto-related activities.  
Group risk  Firms must assess group risks as part of risk management and disclosures. There are no bespoke group requirements at this stage.  
Own fund requirements (OFR) 

CP25/15 introduced the OFR, which is a minimum amount of capital that firms will need to calculate and maintain.   

CP25/42 sets out the rules for calculating the OFR, which will be the highest of either:  

  1. Permanent Minimum Requirement (PMR);  
  2. Fixed Overhead Requirement (FOR); and  
  3. K-Factor Requirement (KFR).  
Permanent minimum requirements  

The PMR applies a fixed figure which is dependent on the regulated activities carried out by the firm. The PMR will range from:  

  • £75,000 for dealing as agent or arranging deals in qualifying cryptoassets;  
  • £150,000 for operating a CATP or qualifying cryptoasset staking; and  
  • £750,000 for dealing as principal in qualifying cryptoassets.  
K-factor requirements  

The KFRs are either activity based (which seek to address operational risk) or exposure based (which apply only to firms that take trading book positions, and typically cover market, credit and concentration risk).   

CP25/42 sets out a number of KFRs that are apply to specific cryptoasset activities.   

Overall risk assessment 

The FCA is consulting on the proposal to require firms to conduct a prudential risk assessment on an ongoing basis, similar to the ICARA requirements on investment firms.   

The proposals include requirements for: identifying and monitoring risks; risk mitigation; business model assessment, capital, and liquidity planning and stress testing; recovery actions; wind-down planning; assessing and monitoring the adequacy of own funds and liquid assets; determining the OFR; determining the liquid asset threshold requirement; and reviewing and documenting the overall risk assessment.  

Public disclosure of prudential information  The proposals introduce a tailored public disclosure framework for cryptoasset firms designed to ensure transparency around firms' prudential position and risk management practices, with requirements to comply at least annually.   

Comment

The new regime will require significant FCA investment in supervision and authorisations. The FCA has never been a cheerleader for cryptoassets, and given the potential for consumer harm we can expect there to be a focus on assertive supervision and enforcement.

The threshold-requirement architecture, referred to in CP25/42, is designed to create clearly evidenced breach points—failure to meet firm-calculated thresholds can become a direct supervisory and enforcement trigger (including potential interventions and, ultimately, use of statutory powers if wind-down is not initiated when required). Furthermore trading-book and intra-day capital monitoring expectations (introduced in the prudential K-factor requirements under CP25/42) coupled with the FCA's expressed concern about "misclassifying exposures to reduce capital requirements", expand the set of prudential control failures that can be framed as systems-and-controls breaches and used as an enforcement lever.

In all markets, the FCA actively takes enforcement action when it becomes aware of market abuse. Our expectation is that the FCA will be equally keen in enforcing detected market abuse in the crypto markets. The FCA is effectively hard-wiring market abuse prevention into the CATP operating model; failure to build/operate adequate monitoring, alerting, insider controls, or cross-platform information sharing (for large CATPs) is likely to become a primary enforcement focus because it undermines the MARC regime's functioning.

The FCA's primary focus is likely to be the retail market. There are bright-line retail protection rules that will lend themselves to outcomes-focused enforcement, for example, unauthorised venue routing, selling non‑admitted tokens to retail, or relying on invalid/non‑compliant disclosures.

The FCA is also likely to focus on management of conflicts of interest. Expect FCA enforcement to focus on whether governance and information barriers are real especially where firms combine venue operation, dealing activity, token issuance interests, and market abuse surveillance responsibilities.

How can we help you?
Help

How can we help you?

Subscribe: I'd like to keep in touch

If your enquiry is urgent please call +44 20 3321 7000

I'm a client

I'm looking for advice

Something else