Real Insights - Property Update Issue 45: November 2019 News Forever greener? More laws to combat climate change The real estate sector is responsible for more than 20% of the world’s carbon emissions, according to the 2016 World Economic Forum report. News One step closer to e-signing in real estate transactions? In September 2019 we wrote an article about the Law Commission's recent report which confirmed that electronic signatures are valid under English law, for both contracts and deeds. News Solicitors Journal: A matter of intention Property Litigation Managing Associate Mark Reading and Associate Isabel Lich analyse the first application of the Franses conditional intention test for landlords in the context of telecommunications. News Professional Negligence: When the claim depends on hypothetical actions of a third party In a recent negligence case against a firm of solicitors, the High Court decided that where the claim depended on the hypothetical actions of a third party, it was appropriate to assess the claimant's case on the "loss of chance" basis rather than on the balance of probabilities. Podcast Scott Malkin Founder and Chairman, Value Retail Scott Malkin is the founder an
News Forever greener? More laws to combat climate change The real estate sector is responsible for more than 20% of the world’s carbon emissions, according to the 2016 World Economic Forum report.
News One step closer to e-signing in real estate transactions? In September 2019 we wrote an article about the Law Commission's recent report which confirmed that electronic signatures are valid under English law, for both contracts and deeds.
News Solicitors Journal: A matter of intention Property Litigation Managing Associate Mark Reading and Associate Isabel Lich analyse the first application of the Franses conditional intention test for landlords in the context of telecommunications.
News Professional Negligence: When the claim depends on hypothetical actions of a third party In a recent negligence case against a firm of solicitors, the High Court decided that where the claim depended on the hypothetical actions of a third party, it was appropriate to assess the claimant's case on the "loss of chance" basis rather than on the balance of probabilities.