• Home
  • Latest
  • Lloyd v Google Court of Appeal judgment

Lloyd v Google Court of Appeal judgment

Posted on 02 October 2019

Lloyd v Google Court of Appeal judgment

This morning, the Court of Appeal, in a unanimous decision, overturned the Judgment of Mr Justice Warby dated 8 October 2018 which had refused Mishcon de Reya's client, Richard Lloyd, permission to serve a representative action on Google LLC. The claim relates to what is known as the "Safari Workaround" - Google's alleged unlawful and clandestine tracking of iPhone users in 2011 and 2012 without their consent through the use of third party cookies. Mr Lloyd seeks damages against Google LLC on behalf of a class of over 4 million iPhone users alleging breaches of s.4(4) of the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA) and claiming compensation under s.13 of the Act. The claim is brought as a representative action under CPR r19.6.

The Court of Appeal's decision is ground breaking in that it confirms a number of important legal principles under Data Protection law and for representative actions under CPR r19.6 that could establish a new procedural framework for the conduct of mass data breach claims:

  • An individual's personal data has an economic value and loss of control of that data is a violation of their right to privacy which can, in principle, constitute damage under s.13 of the DPA, without the need to demonstrate pecuniary loss or distress. The Court, can therefore, award a uniform per capita sum to members of the class in representative actions for the loss of control of their personal data.
  • That individuals who have lost control of their personal data have suffered the same loss and therefore share the "same interest" under CPR 19.6.
  • That representative actions are, in practice, the only way that claims such as this can be pursued.

Mishcon de Reya Partner James Oldnall, who leads the case, said:

“This decision is significant not only for the millions of consumers affected by Google’s activity but also for the collective action landscape more broadly.

"The Court of Appeal has confirmed our view that representative actions are essential for holding corporate giants to account. In doing so it has established an avenue to redress for consumers.”

The Mishcon de Reya team also comprised Managing Associates Lara Melrose and Edward Carder.

To access the full judgment please click here.

Related Coverage
BBC News
The Telegraph
Computer Business Review
Gizmodo 
RT
Sott 
Newpaper 
Techcrunch 
FT 
The Lawyer (subscription only)
Top Class Actions 
Litigation Futures

 

 

How can we help you?

How can we help you?

Subscribe: I'd like to keep in touch

If your enquiry is urgent please call +44 20 3321 7000

Crisis Hotline

Emergency number:

I'm a client

Please enter your first name
Please enter your last name
Please enter your enquiry
Please enter a value

I'm looking for advice

Please enter your first name
Please enter your last name
Please enter your enquiry
Please select a department
Please select a contact method

Something else

Please enter your first name
Please enter your last name
Please enter your enquiry
Please select your contact method of choice