Mishcon de Reya page structure
Site header
Main menu
Main content section
a close up of a green building

Climate Litigation Lunchbreak: Milieudefensie's Eline Zeilmaker on the case against Shell

DateTimeOnline

In 2021, a case brought by six NGOs led by Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands) against Shell made legal history: the District Court of The Hague ordered the oil giant to cut its global carbon footprint by 45% by 2030.  

This November, that decision was annulled on appeal from Shell. 

The Dutch Court of Appeal found there was no consensus on how the collective task of achieving net zero should be allocated to individual companies, meaning that imposing a specific emission reduction order on Shell would therefore be inappropriate in its view. The Court also doubted whether an order against one company would be effective in the absence of compliance by the wider industry. 

However, the Court nonetheless confirmed that Shell had a legal duty to mitigate dangerous climate change and hinted that the development of new oil and gas fields may be at odds with that duty. 

Those findings ring rather hollow, however, in the absence of any concrete remedy for the claimants.  

What are the key takeaways from the case for corporate climate litigation?  And is there scope for an appeal to the Supreme Court?  

We discuss the decision with Eline Zeilmaker, Senior Legal Counsel at Milieudefensie, in this lunchtime digital session.

How can we help you?
Help

How can we help you?

Subscribe: I'd like to keep in touch

If your enquiry is urgent please call +44 20 3321 7000

Crisis Hotline

I'm a client

I'm looking for advice

Something else